感觉本站的内容过于分散

By rrrr at 2019-11-28 • 1138次点击
rrrr

不能

at 2019-11-28
1

时政话题讨论的风格和其他内容非常不兼容,时政话题非常容易占据整个版面,这个从旧新品葱都能看出来。另外,网络政论,个人觉得有价值的内容不多,一言不合开喷得多,对方一回嘴整个版面就没法看了。因此 @BE4 提出时政独立,我觉得这个主意不错。

水节点承担了非常重要的管理功能。

我不是很在乎人多人少,能够有个不害怕、不闹心的地方发言就够了。先满足自己的需求,再想其他的。

小二 at 2019-11-28
2

自己去看详细论证过程 https://2049bbs.xyz/t/1815

BE4 at 2019-11-29
3

人少不怕,倒是乐意见到一些高质量的帖子。 以我个人来说,并不喜欢隔壁站的氛围,除了政治就是战斗,还有一些口嗨抖机灵的。。 而且又不是自己没有事情干,整天住站里的那种,一言不合就对线。 个人比较喜欢 摆事实讲道理的帖子,比如这位老哥分分析: https://2049bbs.xyz/t/1774 (猜测是同行或者近似的工作)

有毒养猪大叔 at 2019-11-29
4

I think 2049bbs is not appropriate for serious beings (targeting at academic researches), reasons (including but not limited in):

  1. Who's the audience? Specialized audience should seek for specialized sites (say, arXiv subfields daily check etc.) See also “知识的诅咒” 和科普的难题

  2. As an author, writing seriously takes a lot of time, time is precious.

BTW, I just want to analyze (seriously) how implementable Radical Markets can be.

radical market ... 能够把贯穿近现代史两百年的两大股思潮结合在一起,是因为它发现了自由主义和马克思主义二者共同的那个立足「根本」。 而这个根本,一是上面提到的一套幂函数的逻辑,二要求很低的市场交易成本。 而区块链、加密货币的价值,就是从技术上降低了转账的交易成本。 所以作者在书中明确地提出了,比特币的出现,加密货币的诞生,能够与 radical market 相结合,可能激发出魔法般的化学反应。这本书去年被以太坊创始人 V 神读到,他发现了这一点,于是把书介绍到了区块链行业。

Apart from the section of data labor (See also), other sections seem not implementable enough, We can't establish & dont't need Perpetual Motion (probably except for Platonists), unless humans can be informational-ized, which is NOT dissipative, thus won't rely on marginal analysis.

Combining blockchain is more like forging a so-called value consensus, like axioms in math, if you commit a set of certain axioms, the corresponding system is consistent (though it may not be complete), if not, you cannot be convinced ... such tricks won't work for me. See also the blow-ups of blockchain from ZhangShouCheng.

PS: I've been typing in English cuz Chinese input method is not installed on this machine ...

NULL1089 at 2019-11-29
5
登录 后发表评论