I think 2049bbs is not appropriate for serious beings (targeting at academic researches), reasons (including but not limited in):
Who's the audience? Specialized audience should seek for specialized sites (say, arXiv subfields daily check etc.) See also “知识的诅咒” 和科普的难题
As an author, writing seriously takes a lot of time, time is precious.
BTW, I just want to analyze (seriously) how implementable Radical Markets can be.
radical market ... 能够把贯穿近现代史两百年的两大股思潮结合在一起，是因为它发现了自由主义和马克思主义二者共同的那个立足「根本」。 而这个根本，一是上面提到的一套幂函数的逻辑，二要求很低的市场交易成本。 而区块链、加密货币的价值，就是从技术上降低了转账的交易成本。 所以作者在书中明确地提出了，比特币的出现，加密货币的诞生，能够与 radical market 相结合，可能激发出魔法般的化学反应。这本书去年被以太坊创始人 V 神读到，他发现了这一点，于是把书介绍到了区块链行业。
Apart from the section of data labor (See also), other sections seem not implementable enough, We can't establish & dont't need Perpetual Motion (probably except for Platonists), unless humans can be informational-ized, which is NOT dissipative, thus won't rely on marginal analysis.
Combining blockchain is more like forging a so-called value consensus, like axioms in math, if you commit a set of certain axioms, the corresponding system is consistent (though it may not be complete), if not, you cannot be convinced ... such tricks won't work for me. See also the blow-ups of blockchain from ZhangShouCheng.
PS: I've been typing in English cuz Chinese input method is not installed on this machine ...